What's wrong with this headline: "Attacked reality star left for dead" (Daily Telegraph 26/10/11)?
What's wrong with this headline: "Attacked reality star left for dead" (Daily Telegraph 26/10/11)?
rattling bones undead musician magazine
sea shanties and the modern man (tales of abner mapleleaf)
rootwork the rootsblog: a cyberhoodoo webspace
martin olson's mystery miscellany
rattling bones undead musician magazine
mystery, suspense, and god, oh my!
Unless otherwise stated, all content including text, images and audio, published on this blog, Cosmic Rapture, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available on application to the copyright owner, S R Schwarz, by writing to masterymistery at gmail dot com. All rights are reserved by the copyright owner. Content may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright owner.
To me, it reads awkwardly. Then of course, there's the fact that there should be no such thing as a reality "star." As a proofreader, I would correct it to "Reality star attacked, left for dead."
Hi Faycin, yes I had in mind "reality star". Boiling it down to its essentials: "an unknown, well-known person".
Whether this contradiction-in-terms is interesting or significant enough to warrant being posted in a blog, is another matter!
Thanks for stopping by.
MM
Or it could be a star, that in reality was a massive, luminous ball of plasma held together by gravity. It was attacked by a black hole and gravitationally collapsed resulting in death.
Hi Karen, yes I had that one coming! Well warranted -- thanks! hehehe, or even: ;-)
Comments? Come on... gimme your best shot!