how many people are you today?

This post is the promised conclusion to the post called "Living Arrangements" published on April 8.

Is the universe alive, intelligent, aware and self-aware? Are human beings cells in the body of the universe?

According to ancient Greek philosopher Plato, "The Universe is a single whole, comprised of many parts that are also wholes."

In similar vein, Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius saw the Universe as "...one living organism, with a single substance and a single soul." (Marcus Aurelius "Meditations")

More recently, in "Sun of gOd" Gregory Sams talks about the concept of a "...self-organising consciousness that underlies everything." (Thanks to Sams for the Plato and Marcus Aurelius quotes, both of which are "borrowed" from "Sun of gOd".)

In "Cosmos and Psyche" Richard Tarnas proposes "...the possible reality of an ensouled cosmos of transformative beauty and purposeful intelligence. ...the cosmos as a living whole appears to be informed by some kind of pervasive creative intelligence ...of scarcely conceivable power, complexity and aesthetic subtlety..."

In "Oriental Mythology" --- Volume 2 of his four-volume work, "The Masks of God" --- Jospeh Campbell suggests that " ...the universe ... is correlative, is generally interdependent and thus mutually originating: no single being exists in and of itself...".

According to Japanese scholar Professor Takakusu (quoted in "Oriental Mythology") the "Profound Theory of Correlation" of Buddhist philosophy points to the fact that "... all things coexist, simultaneously arising. They coexist, furthermore, not only in relation to space, but also in relation to time; for past, present and future include each other. ... Distinct as they are, and separated as they seem to be in time, all beings are united to make one entity---from the universal point of view."

But never mind philosophers, emperors, mythologists and professors. No hard-nosed scientist would subscribe to such rampant anthropomorphism, or would they?

Today, cosmologists tell us that the Universe was born in the Big Bang some 14 billion years ago, and has been expanding, exploding outwards, ever since. According to one particular cosmological model, the expansion is slowing down due to the pull of gravity, and will eventually halt, then reverse as the so called "Big Crunch" gets underway, ie as the universe implodes towards the singularity of its origin. And when it gets there, according to the model, it will explode outwards again in another Big Bang, as part of an eternal cycle of explosion/implosion. Metaphorically at least, the Big Bang/Big Crunch cycle is the Universe breathing in and out. Or its heartbeat, if you prefer.

As discussed in Living Arrangements, under the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the Universe is on a path from order to disorder, with total disorder representing death. From the moment of its birth in the Big Bang the Universe has been moving from order to disorder. When the Big Crunch gets underway, the movement will be in the opposite direction, from disorder to order. And thus the Big Bang / Big Crunch cycle gives rise to yet another metaphor: the recurring reincarnation of God, in which creator and creation traverse the endless circle of birth, death and rebirth.

Now, apologies but we need to go on a brief but important terminological digression, concerning the word "universe". It's simply no longer big enough. At one stage, "universe" meant literally and figuratively "everything". But the currency has been debased; the word has been hijacked to mean less than it once did, particularly since the advent of such concepts as "multiverse", "maxiverse" and "pocket universe". After all, if there are multiple universes, then they are not universes.

To write this post I need a word that refers not only to the material universe, but also to all immaterial domains; in which live such things as thought, time, emotion, meaning, laws of physics, mathematical formulae, relationships, patterns, processes, dreams, archetypes, hallucinations, recipes, etc. These things are no less real for being immaterial.

I need a word that refers not only to things that are, but also to things that are not, and to things that have been, will be or could be.

For the purposes of this post, the word "Reality" is bigger and better than "Universe" but still not big enough. I need a word that includes material things and immaterial things; plus things in the past, present and future; plus things that are actual and things that are only potential or conditional.

Trouble is I can't find a suitable word, so let's use the acronym ETI, to stand for Everything That Is, has been, will be or could be.

Now let's rephrase the orinal question:

Is ETI intelligent, aware and self-aware?

Referring to the "process/substrate" symbiosis discussed in Living Arrangements, it's instructive to think of the material universe as the substrate (the hardware) on which "runs" the process (the software) of universal consciousness. Together, that substrate and that process comprise the person referred to as ETI.

A name for the substrate could be what Hindu/Buddhist philosophers refer to as "Brahman", "... the eternal, unchanging, infinite, immanent, and transcendent reality which is the Divine Ground of all matter, energy, time, space, being, and everything beyond..." (Wikipedia 18th April 2010). Another name for the substrate could be what cosmologists call the "Higgs Field".

Referring to the "Gestalt" concept discussed in Living Arrangements, to identify ETI as a single, living thing is to formulate the biggest possible gestalt-of-persons. The thing that contains all living things is not only the biggest living thing of all; it's simply the Biggest Thing of all.

In Living Arrangements we discussed the concept of the "holon" --- that which is a whole and simultaneously a part. At this point it's instructive to repeat the Plato quote:

"The Universe is a single whole, comprised of many parts that are also wholes."

Let's see Plato's holon and raise him infinity. Everything is a holon: you, me, the Solar System, the works of Shakespeare, each leaf on my patio that needs sweeping. Everything is a whole in and of itself, and a part of something else. The only possible exception is ETI, who is a whole but (maybe) not a part. I say "possible exception" because it's unclear (at least to me) whether ETI is a part of zirself, or not.

Plato's statement suggests the concept of nested holons (holons within holons); each is self-contained, and simultaneously contained within another.

I am a self-contained whole, and a part of ETI. Every cell in my body is a self-contained whole, and a part of me, and a part of ETI.

Every living thing is a self-contained, self organising whole that is also part of something else. Living things continue to explore new ways of living through, across, within, below, above, adjacent to and far from each other.

A pregnant woman is part of ETI. The little person living in her womb is part of her (and of ETI).

An ant is an organism that is a part of an ant colony. An ant colony is a potentially immortal super-organism greater than the sum of its parts. Every ant and every ant colony is a part of ETI.

ETI includes immaterial as well as material things. All the immaterial "persons" mentioned in getting personal are parts of ETI, including the shadowy, non-corporeal persons living outside of time and space that stand behind every species of living thing: the genome, or the "soul of the species", so to speak.

Every civilisation, culture and society is a part of ETI. And so too is every meme, computer virus, and 'artificial intelligence".

And of course, lastly but by no means leastly, every god is part of ETI.

And guess what? ETI is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent.


HOME

eBooks by Cosmic Rapture

NIGHTMERRIES: THE LIGHTER SIDE OF DARKNESS This so-called "book" will chew you up, spit you out, and leave you twitching and frothing on the carpet. More than 60 dark and feculent fictions (read ‘em and weep) copiously illustrated by over 20 grotesque images you wouldn't want to meet in a dark alley.

AWAREWOLF & OTHER CRHYMES AGAINST HUMANITY (Vot could be Verse?) We all hate poetry, right? But we might make an exception for this sick and twisted stuff. This devil's banquet of adults-only offal features more than 50 satanic sonnets, vitriolic verses and odious odes.

MANIC MEMES & OTHER MINDSPACE INVADERS A disturbing repository of quotably quirky quotes, sayings, proverbs, maxims, ponderances, adages and aphorisms. This menagerie holds no fewer than 184 memes from eight meme-species perfectly adapted to their respective environments.

MASTRESS & OTHER TWISTED TAILS, ILLUSTRATED: an unholy corpus of oddities, strangelings, bizarritudes and peculiaritisms

FIENDS & FREAKS Adults-only Tales of Serpents, Dragons, Devils, Lobsters, Anguished Spirits, Gods, Anti-gods and Other Horse-thieves You Wouldn't Want to Meet in a Dark Kosmos: 4th Edition

HAGS TO HAGGIS Whiskey-soaked Tails of War-nags, Witches, Manticores and Escapegoats, Debottlenecking and Desilofication, Illustrated

mgeorge said...

a. Mystic experiences, however impressive, need to be investigated and explained.

b. The universe, though vast beyond our ken, seems to function as a teaching machine. This could be the idea behind coincidences that Carl Jung mentioned. Unlike diamonds, coincidences sprout all over when you look for them. Or that could be a human way of viewing evolution at multiple levels.

c. Morpic resonace is the term Dr. Rupert Sheldrake uses to renew the Platonic idea of forms and behaviours (ideas) in germ / plan / databank form. The idea has not been challenged in any serious way, and I gather scientists are ignoring it in the hope that it will go away.

masterymistery said...

mgeorge, thanks for your comments. Agree with you about Jung and coincidences. Synchronicity is another way of putting it. Since I started looking out for them in my life, they do seem to "pop up" in the strangest places and ways.

I've read a little bit of Sheldrake's work: found it very interesting. I don't agree with some of what he has to say, but it certainly is thought provoking.

gregchaos said...

Hi MisterY, I like the way you put it together in your conclusion, and am honoured to find myself in such illustrious company. Thinking it could be uphill work trying to replace the familiar G word with a hard-sounding acronym like ETI. So wonder if you've considered the 'gOd' spelling that I use in "Sun of gOd", which differentiates from the Biblical and implies Oneness?
Gregory Sams

masterymistery said...

Hi Greg, thanks for your comment.

Illustrious company? I think it was Newton who said, "If I have seen further it is because I've stood on the shoulders of giants".

I take your point about "ETI". It's not soft and smooth in the mouth when you say it. But it is a hard-working acronym with multiple meanings, including "Extra Terrestrial Intelligence".

For me the issue with the g-word is the baggage it carries. I find that the moment it's uttered is the end of any prospect for rational conversation. Everyone has their pre-conceived ideas about what it means or should mean. And many if not most have a strong emotional attachment to their interpretation of what it means or should mean.

By the way, what did the Buddhist say to the hotdog vendor? "Make me one with everything".

Cheers!

Alice Audrey said...

Forget the G-word. I'll go with Mamon, myself.

masterymistery said...

Hi Alice, you wouldn't want the curse of King Midas now would you?

Alice Audrey said...

How'd we get from Voodoo to Ancient Greece? Don't tell me it's a spelling thing again.

mgeorge said...

What a coincidence and delight that I found this, just what I was talking about:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627571.100-the-secrets-of-intelligence-lie-within-a-single-cell.html

If it sounds far-fetched, you could try to search for an article on nanotubes found on the insides of the wall of every type of cell, of unknown purpose (Could not find it). Seaching for quantum, cell and mind also throws up a huge amount of stuff.

BTW, mastermistery, thanks for taking the trouble to read my long article and comment.

masterymistery said...

Hi mgeorge, sounds very interesting --- I'll certainly look it up. I don't know very much about nanotubes, except that aren't they supposedly a link between the quantum and the classical world in the body of an organism? Need to know more! Call to action.

As well as thoroughly enjoying your article, from which I learned a lot, I also learned about the existence of "knols" a form of collaborative knowledge-sharing I'd been totally unaware of til now.