Is reality lumpy or smooth?
Quantum physicists say lumpy. String theorists get all tied up in knots about it. M-theorists haven’t got the branes to know. Relativists absolutely understand the gravity of the situation. They find reality to be smoompy, no, smumpy, no, looth.
What came first, thought or language? Gotta be thought---you can have thought without language but not language without thought.
Unemployed pantheist, provocative iconoclast, abusive solipsist, failed psychopath.
Unless otherwise stated, all content including text, images and audio, published on this blog, Cosmic Rapture, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available on application to the copyright owner, S R Schwarz, by writing to masterymistery at gmail dot com. All rights are reserved by the copyright owner. Content may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright owner.
Ah, reality. It's all relative anyway. So as my Cousin Vinny says, "Fuhgeddaboutit. Let's go and git Shitfaced."
I just realized that you might like the odd blogs of one of my longtime blog friends, Tom. Though he's got a bit of writer's block right now he's worth a look and he tends to respond to people who comment on his blogs. Try this one:
http://growinguplammy.blogspot.com
Very informative.
What came first_the words or the writing?
It might appear stupid but it's a pretty hard question if you dig a bit.
Same as yours.
reality: "To be or not to be".
Get into fresh water when it's hot and this won't matter anymore.
Cheers.
COMMENTS? Come on... gimme your best shot!